SAN DIEGO (CN) – The Quechan Tribe claims the Secretary of the Interior rushed through approval of a giant solar power project in the Mojave Desert and ignored potential damage to the tribe’s cultural artifacts and the desert’s sensitive flora and fauna, including an endangered lizard that appears in the tribe’s creation story.
The 709-megawatt Imperial Valley Solar Project will spread 28,360 “SunCatcher” dishes across 6,360 acres of public land, about 14 miles west of El Centro.
The Department of the Interior approved Tessera Solar’s proposal in an Oct. 13 Record of Decision (ROD).
“The public lands that are the subject of the Imperial Valley ROD are within the traditional territory of the Quechan Indian Tribe and contain cultural and biological resources of significance to the tribe, its government, and its members,” the tribe says in its federal complaint.
“The tribe and its members also have an interest in preserving the quality of the land, water, air, fauna, and flora within the tribe’s traditional territory, within and outside the reservation. Specifically, the tribe is concerned with impacts to the habitat of Flat Tailed Horned lizards on lands proposed for development, as the lizard is a central part of the tribe’s creation story.”
In making its “fast-track” decision, the Secretary of the Interior and others omitted reviews required by the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, the National Historic Preservation Act, the Federal Land Policy Management Act and other laws, the tribe says.
“Interior arbitrarily placed the IVS Project on an artificial ‘fast-track’ in order to achieve the applicant’s goal of obtaining millions of dollars of federally available financing that purportedly required project approval prior to the end of 2010,” the tribe says.
“Despite Interior and the applicant’s efforts to ‘fast-track’ the review of the IVS Project, Congress did not waive or limit the applicability of any federal laws or regulations related to compliance with NEPA, the NHPA, FLPMA, or other laws with regard to the IVS Project. Full compliance with applicable federal laws is mandatory.”
Tessera Solar will buy 6,600 acres of flat-tail horned lizard habitat to offset land lost to new roads, structures and traffic through the desert, the Bureau of Land Management said in announcing the project, one of the first solar energy developments to be approved on public land.
The Quechans, a Yuman-speaking people, have lived in the Mojave Desert for “thousands of years,” during which they and their “tribal ancestors traditionally occupied, traveled, traded, and utilized resources within a broad geographical area located within the desert lands of modern-day [western] Arizona and Southern California,” according to the complaint. Today the tribe has about 3,500 members.
The tribe’s 45,000-acre reservation sprawls across the Mojave Desert around Interstate 8, and to the south borders on Baja California, Mexico. The area has long been identified as a prime location to develop utility-grade solar energy projects.
“The IVS Project is only one of many large solar and renewable energy projects located on California desert lands that have recently been approved, or are under consideration for approval, by Interior,” the complaint states. “Approximately 1 million acres of land are currently proposed for foreseeable solar and wind energy utility development on Southern California desert lands.”
The tribe wants the project enjoined and the Record of Decision vacated.
It is represented by Frank Jozwiak with Morisset Schlosser in Seattle and Bryan Snyder of San Diego
Category Archives: U.S. News
Solar farm sparks heated debate in California’s Panoche Valley
San Benito County officials support a proposed Solargen facility just south of San Francisco Bay, but local farmers and ranchers say it will ruin their livelihoods and further endanger some species.
A kind of family feud has erupted in San Benito County’s rich slice of Central California farmland over plans to build a massive solar power facility in a valley shared by 20 ranchers and organic farmers and some of the rarest creatures in the United States.
Both sides of the dispute insist they are fighting for the same things — protecting the environment and growing the local economy.
County officials — some of them farmers themselves — believe Solargen Energy Inc.’s proposed 400-megawatt solar farm on 5,000 acres just south of San Francisco Bay will be a key part of a new future based, in part, on green technology.
But the small-scale ranchers, farmers and horse trainers who live and work in the misty pastures and furrowed slopes of Panoche Valley believe the old connotation of “green” is worth more.
“They are selling us and a unique landscape out for a measly 50 long-term jobs and $24 million spread out over 20 years,” said Kim Williams, who raises grass-fed pastured chickens in the valley. “That’s pathetic.”
In an effort to hasten construction of the plant, the county recently approved a final environmental impact report that opponents say was faulty.
In addition, despite opposition from the California Farm Bureau, county leaders and the San Benito County Farm Bureau approved the withdrawal of about 6,500 acres in the Panoche Valley from pacts intended to keep that land in agriculture for 10 years, in return for tax breaks under the state’s Williamson Act.
The San Benito County Board of Supervisors was expected to approve a conditional use permit for the project, which would cover nearly a third of the valley floor, within a few weeks.
County officials say they are not fast-tracking the project, as detractors suspect.
Many county officials suggested that the valley’s land was of marginal agricultural value, and that concerns about the solar panels’ effect on habitat crucial to the survival of three federally endangered species —the giant kangaroo rat, the San Joaquin kit fox and the blunt-nosed leopard lizard — were overstated.
“The photovoltaic plant looks like nothing more than a vineyard, so the risk to the creatures is insignificant,” said Greg Swett, president of the San Benito County Farm Bureau. “If the blunt-nosed leopard lizard is a standard lizard, it will get out of the way.”
Nancy Martin, president and chief executive officer of the San Benito County Economic Development Corp., would not go that far. But she likes to say, “Now is the time to reinvent ourselves and take advantage of a confluence of opportunities. We cherish our environment, but we also must cherish the people who live here. If we weigh the needs of the lizard against the needs of the people, I think the people win.”
Sensing their pastoral community is slipping away from them, Panoche Valley residents have been studying their legal options in a case that also is being watched by environmental groups, including the Defenders of Wildlife and the Center for Biological Diversity.
The arid, wind-whipped Panoche Valley is a checkerboard of vineyards, pistachio orchards and range lands scented with sage and pungent vinegar-bush. Long-eared owls and ferruginous hawks roost in the cottonwood trees edging a perennial stream. Cattle and horses share the flatlands with foxes, badgers, tarantulas, gopher snakes and the blunt-nosed leopard lizard, a large, multicolored reptile with bright stripes on its back and a penchant for dashing hundreds of yards at the sound of human voices.
“For years we thought we were far enough away from the powers that be that they would leave us alone,” said Panoche Valley cattle rancher Nenette Corotto, 74. “Now, it seems the county is going down a new rail. It’s a new ball game and we have to survive it.”
United under the banner Save Panoche Valley, the small-scale ranchers and farmers argue that building something on the scale of the Solargen power plant will kill wildlife, spook valuable livestock and clog the valley’s narrow dirt lane — which is subject to flooding after even modest rain — with heavy traffic.
“I have never seen a process as rushed as this one, and it’s happening in the face of real environmental impacts,” said Mike Westphal, a Bureau of Land Management herpetologist. “Those species will not recover if this area is lost.”
While Panoche Valley ranchers rally around their embattled landscape, related pressing issues have been unfolding in the offices of state and federal regulatory agencies in Sacramento and Washington.
Before construction can begin, the project must be permitted by the California Department of Fish and Game and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, a process expected to take several months. It remains unclear whether the project would be eligible for federal loans and stimulus programs scheduled to expire Dec. 31.
In August, Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger dispatched a letter to the Obama administration urging that it help find a way to expedite endangered species reviews by the Fish and Wildlife Service for several renewable energy projects trying to break ground on private land this year, including Solargen’s. “We need immediate action if these projects are to have a chance of receiving a permit in time to meet this deadline for groundbreaking or the deadline for the Department of Energy loan guarantees,” Schwarzenegger said.
Mike Peterson, president and chief executive officer of Solargen, said the project can be built without federal subsidies. He said the power plant is an ideal fit for the valley, one of the sunniest spots in Central California with direct access to local Pacific Gas & Electric transmission lines. Beyond that, he said, the company has developed a generous mitigation plan, which includes setting aside 23,000 acres as a permanent grazing easement and habitat, most of it outside the valley.
“I believe we will be a benefit to these endangered species,” Peterson said. As for Panoche Valley ranchers and farmers, Peterson said, “I understand their concerns. The sacrifice for them is that the valley will have a change. Truth is, they may have to go out of business.”
That kind of talk rankles Panoche Valley dairyman Ron Garthwaite, co-owner of 4-year-old Claravale Farm.
“You don’t destroy a group of people and their way of life just because you stand to make a little money off of something like this,” Garthwaite said. “County officials are either incredibly stupid or incredibly disingenuous. I suspect the latter. I think they believe that, as individuals, they will somehow gain politically or financially off it. Otherwise, it makes no sense.”
San Benito County Supervisor Reb Monaco, whose district includes Panoche Valley, said Garthwaite missed the point.
“Our small rural county has discovered a new marketable commodity: sunshine,” he said. “Is it risky? Yes. But there are also potential benefits for the county and the world.”
Very large protected areas preserve wilderness but ignore rare species
Study finds that the areas are most important for a limited range of land cover types
Protected areas are generally seen as a triumph for the preservation of nature, yet the reality on the ground is more complex.
The world’s largest protected areas encompass vast amounts of wilderness but do not extensively overlap the highest priority areas for conservation or include unusually large numbers of birds, amphibians, or mammals, according to an analysis published in the November issue of BioScience. The study, by Lisette Cantú-Salazar and Kevin J. Gaston of the University of Sheffield, United Kingdom, nonetheless describes anecdotal evidence that some very large protected areas play an important conservation role, by preserving natural species assemblages and populations of regional concern.
Cantú-Salazar and Gaston examined in detail the 63 protected areas that each extend over 25,000 square kilometers or more (about the area of Vermont). These huge areas are found in all continents except Antarctica, and are preferentially found in areas where there are few people. The findings thus seem to support the idea that such areas are created in places where they will least inconvenience people, rather than where they would do the most for conservation.
Yet very large protected areas are also likely to include particular land-cover types, such as snow and ice, bare areas, and areas with sparse vegetation. Examination of individual cases reveals that several ecoregions of high conservation priority are partly included in very large protected areas, including the Guianan Highlands Moist Forests, the Tibetan Plateau Steppe, and the Eastern Himalayan Alpine Meadows. Their preservation is therefore important. And many of the largest protected areas are vulnerable, Cantú-Salazar and Gaston conclude. Some have inadequate management. Others are threatened by incursions for logging, fishing, grazing, and mining, and the effects of climate change and political instability.
Python problem can be solved by serving up snakes
The Everglades, according to experts who get paid $53.50 per hour to know stuff the rest of us take for granted, are slithering with 43,000 escaped or released Burmese Pythons. We citizens know that Burma isn’t Burma any more but Myanmar. Those herpetologists are too busy trying to attach generous dental and medical coverage benefits to their compensation packages to know the current name of the source of the pythons now eating our native alligators. Our alligators eat French poodles, Yorkshire terriers and Belgian tourists foolish enough to get out of their cars. The pythons eat the alligators, thus completing the circle of life and lunch as depicted in “The Lion King” movie.
However, we taxpayers could be asked to pay for tidying up this problem, just as we pay for those free lunches, of which there are none. Since I don’t have a few billion dollars idle in my MegaBank retirement account, I’ve figured out a way for all entrepreneurial parties to earn gobs of money while getting rid of the 51,000 escaped or released pythons.
First, we develop fabulous recipes for baked, fried, sauteed, steamed, shish-kebabed, chilled, sushi-ed, stuffed, burrito-ed, taco-ed, meat-loafed, standing rib and everything else for python. I’m certain this could be done in about 15 minutes, since “everything tastes like chicken,” and we have page upon page of chicken recipes that could be adapted. Obviously, we won’t serve Buffalo python wings. We will not serve python drumsticks. Nor python thighs. However, we will have meter upon meter of yummy python rib roasts.
A few people might whine, “I don’t have an oven long enough to roast even a two-meter python. And how will it look with the apple in its mouth under those beady eyes and deadly poisonous fangs?”
I say, “Nonsense, you simply coil your python into a conventional roaster pan, then lay apple slices all along it. And pythons don’t have poisonous fangs.”
Second, we taxpayers will see a significant increase in gate collections at the entrance to Everglades National Park as people armed with machetes, axes, shotguns, mortars, asbestos tiles, or pistols, hike out into the saw-grass looking for exotic digestible entrees instead of rindy plastic food stamps. People will become more aware of the delicate and essential nature of the Everglades when it replaces their butcher store. Rather than authorizing some developers dream of selling “smooshy swamp” for a billion dollars per acre then moving himself and his fortune to Aruba, citizens will eagerly spend money to protect the park and its 62,000 escaped or released pythons filled environment.
Third, dozens of hunting, killing, butchering, dressing out, packaging, freezing and distribution businesses will form up to handle demand, reducing unemployment to pre-sub-prime loan levels as the foreclosed-upon once again earn generous salaries and move indoors.
Fourth, restaurants will expand, or perhaps even new restaurants will open. Serving not the usual chicken, pizza, burgers, tacos, barbecue pork, my Miami Fried Python franchise will open in restaurants in hundreds of cities all across America, aiding the construction industry’s revival. More people will drive to dine out, thusly reviving Detroit’s sales figures.
If you would like to invest directly with me in this venture, please send a few zillion dollars along with your name and mailing address to the News Chief. I dismissed asking for capitol funds from bankers. Instead, I’m intending to use bankers as bait for the 78,000 released or escaped pythons.
Halloween Celebration at the Park
The Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) and Friends of Dinosaur State Park and Arboretum will host a Halloween celebration for the entire family on Sunday, October 31, 2010 at Dinosaur State Park, Rocky Hill.
Dinosaur State Park’s Halloween program will run from 11:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. The day will feature a wide variety of programs for families. They will include:
· 1:00 p.m. “Jeepers Creepers!” – Riverside Reptiles will present a 45-minute program featuring snakes, spiders and other creatures. Space is limited to 100 visitors. Tickets are available on a first-come, first-served basis on the day of the show.
· 11:00 a.m. and 2:30 p.m. Meet the park’s animals.
· 11:30 a.m. Track Talk – Learn about the dinosaur tracks found at the park.
· 11:30 a.m. – 3:00 p.m. Arts & Crafts station will be open.
· Three different films will be shown throughout the day.
· Come in costume and have your face painted!
· Treats (non-edible) for everyone!
How evolution takes the sting out of snake venom
The largest venomous snake in the world and an icon to all snake enthusiasts, the king cobra’s venom is not, ounce for ounce (or milligram for milligram, as the professionals would measure it), the most potent. Among land snakes, that honour appears to belong to the inland taipan of Australia. But what the king cobra lacks in potency, it makes up for in volume. Its half-inch fangs deliver a huge dose, up to seven ml of venom, or about one-quarter of a whiskey shot glass. The lethality of venom depends on a combination of its potency, the volume delivered and the size of the victim. A king cobra bite can kill a human in 15 minutes and a full-grown elephant in a few hours.
What makes these cobras kings is not just their size, or their deadliness—after all, they don’t eat humans or elephants—it is that they eat other snakes. Even deadly snakes like kraits or other cobras are prey. These snakes bite when attacked, of course, which raises the question: How does the king cobra maintain such an apparently high-risk lifestyle?
Krait and cobra venoms, including that of the king cobra, act very quickly by crippling the nervous system. Among the arsenal of weapons in the snakes’ venom is one especially potent neurotoxin that works by binding to receptors on muscle cells. The toxin blocks the ability of acetylcholine, one of the body’s chemical neurotransmitters, to control muscle contraction. The blocking of these receptors causes paralysis, respiratory failure and death.
But the king cobra is not fazed by bites from its victims. Biochemists have carefully mapped exactly how neurotoxins block the acetylcholine receptor of many species, and they have discovered that the toxins do not bind to the cobra’s receptor. Mutations have altered the snake’s receptor in such a way that, because the toxin cannot bind to the receptor, the acetylcholine function is undisturbed. The king cobra can subdue its dinner without suffering from any venomous counterattack.
This large snake, resistant to the very potent venoms of its prey, would appear then to be impervious. But how does the mongoose defeat the king cobra? The mongoose’s quick reflexes help it dodge the cobra’s defensive bite, and its powerful jaws can dispatch a snake in one blow. But there are also genetic grounds for the mongoose’s courage. Sometimes an attacking mongoose is bitten, but it has another line of defense against the venom—its acetylcholine receptor has also evolved so that the cobra neurotoxin cannot bind to it. A set of changes in the mongoose’s receptor makes it resemble the cobra’s own resistant receptor.
The mongoose’s evolutionary adaptation is not unique. Other small, humble creatures have evolved ways to endure what for most animals would be lethal snakebites, and some of these resistant animals turn the tables to conquer and consume their venomous foes.
Sea snakes generally possess very toxic venoms. While the snakes rarely bite humans in the water, fishermen are struck occasionally when sifting through their trawls and have died from the bites of some species. The potent venom is not meant for large animals like ourselves, of course. Sea snakes prey on small marine animals, and the powerful toxins in the venom quickly immobilise the prey before it can swim off. Eels are some of the favourite foods of the banded sea krait. Some eels, however, have been observed to be remarkably resistant to the sea krait’s venom.
Harold Heatwole and Judy Powell of North Carolina State University showed that undulated moray eels and liver-coloured moray eels found in the waters around New Guinea can tolerate several hundred times the venom dose that kills spotted moray eels from the Bahamas. The biologists’ explanation for the great disparity in the sensitivity of eel species is that sea snakes are not found in the Atlantic Ocean, so there has been no selective pressure on eels there, whereas in the Pacific, where sea snakes are abundant, selection has been so intense that some eel species have evolved resistance.
A similar situation has evolved among California ground squirrels with respect to the venom of northern Pacific rattlesnakes. This species and most other rattlesnakes kill their prey with a battery of toxins that is different from those of sea snakes and cobras. Rattlesnake venom toxins work by breaking down tissues and causing internal bleeding. A good-size rattlesnake can deliver a hefty dose of venom that is sufficient to kill a human if the bite is left untreated. But ground squirrels in some parts of California, despite being one hundredth the size of humans, exhibit fairly mild effects from the venom. This resistance is not the result of altered receptors, but comes from the ability of proteins in their blood serum to neutralise the effects of venom.
But squirrels of the same species from Alaska, where the rattlesnakes are absent, exhibit much greater sensitivity to the venom, and their serum is much less effective at neutralising the venom. These observations suggest that in some areas where the rattlesnakes are abundant, local squirrel populations have evolved a degree of resistance.
One family of completely harmless snakes, the kingsnake, has also evolved serum that neutralises rattlesnake venom and uses that ability to greater advantage than ground squirrels do. Kingsnakes are a group of beautiful constrictors found in many parts of the United States. As their name indicates, kingsnakes eat other snakes—they do not hesitate to attack, kill and consume rattlesnakes.
Lake detectives find rattlesnakes in home after making drug arrests
After making a drug arrest in Groveland Friday night, Lake County detectives stumbled on something they hadn’t expected: Rattlesnakes.
The Lake County Sheriff’s Office special investigations unit had a warrant to search a home in the 10500 block of Bay Lake Road as part of a drug investigation and detectives were watching the home when they saw two men leave the house in a white truck about 9:30 p.m.
When the detectives stopped the men, they determined that the driver, Hannice Jeffery Simmons Jr., 41, was actively smoking methamphetamine from a glass pipe. Simmons, a convicted felon, also was sitting on a loaded .380 handgun, according to the sheriff’s office.
Detectives arrested Simmons and the other man, 40-year-old Carl Brian Castle, on charges of possession of methamphetamine, possession of drug paraphernalia and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.
When the detectives searched the home, they found more methamphetamine and drug paraphernalia. They also discovered three rattlesnakes in an aquarium, according to the sheriff’s office.
The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission is expected to charge Castle, who owns the home, in connection with possession of the snakes. State law requires people who want to own venomous reptiles to obtain a permit.
Detectives also expect to obtain arrest warrants for methamphetamine possession for two other people who live in Castle’s home, according to the sheriff’s office.